New Models of Affiliation draft parameters

[Bishakha Datta]

Dear all,

Many thanks for bringing the discussion on New Models of Affiliations this
far.

Building on earlier Movement Roles discussions from last year and on the
New Models working group's discussions earlier this month [1], here are a
set of draft principles and parameters for the four categories of models:

-Chapters or National/Sub-national Organizations

-Partner Organizations or Focused Organizations

-Associations or Wiki Groups

-Affiliates or Official Partners of the Wikimedia Movement

They can all be accessed from the Wikimedia affiliation models summary page
[2].

Apart from comments, questions and thoughts that will help us to clarify
and strengthen these draft principles and parameters, we would very much
like your feedback on the proposed nomenclature.

In the working group, we agreed that the names "chapters, partners,
associations and affiliates" are often misleading, somewhat
interchangeable, can mean different things in different contexts, and may
get lost in translation.

Proposals to change the names are on the talk page [3]. Please do leave any
additional comments there.

Cheers,
Bishakha

[1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_affiliation_models
[2] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_affiliation_models/Summary
[3] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_affiliation_models/Summary

[Samuel Klein]

Dear list,

The language of the proposal for new models is updated, and a summary
posted on Meta;
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_affiliation_models
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_affiliation_models/Summary

And ideas / considerations to review over time are being gathered here:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_affiliation_models/Review

I will keep this updated over the course of the weekend as people
raise relevant issues in Berlin; please continue to make changes
yourselves, or to leave significant issues for review on the latter
page.

SJ